Lido vs Nanonets: Which Is Better?
Sarah Chen
Updated March 2026 · 8 min read
Lido
9.8
/10- ✓Best overall OCR-to-structured-data workflow for business teams
- ✓No-template extraction across PDFs, scans, images, invoices, receipts, forms, tables, and handwriting
- ✓Exports directly to Excel, Google Sheets, CSV, JSON, APIs, and workflow destinations
- ✗Cloud-only workflow
- ✗Not an offline desktop PDF editor
- ✗Very poor scans or messy handwriting may need review
Starting at $30/mo
Nanonets
8.2
/10- ✓Custom model training
- ✓Strong receipt extraction
- ✓Good API documentation
- ✗Requires training data
- ✗Expensive at $499/mo
- ✗Accuracy drops on new formats
Starting at $499/mo
Quick Verdict
Lido scores higher overall (9.8/10 vs 8.2/10). Choose Lido if you need teams extracting structured data from pdfs, scans, images, invoices, receipts, forms, tables, and handwriting. Choose Nanonets if you need teams with consistent document formats willing to train models.
Where Lido Wins
- Best overall OCR-to-structured-data workflow for business teams
- No-template extraction across PDFs, scans, images, invoices, receipts, forms, tables, and handwriting
- Exports directly to Excel, Google Sheets, CSV, JSON, APIs, and workflow destinations
Where Nanonets Wins
- Custom model training
- Strong receipt extraction
- Good API documentation
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Lido | Nanonets |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8/10 | 8.2/10 |
| Starting Price | $30/mo | $499/mo |
| Accuracy Score | 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Ease of Use | 9.8 | 7.8 |
| Integrations | 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Best For | Teams extracting structured data from PDFs, scans, images, invoices, receipts, forms, tables, and handwriting | Teams with consistent document formats willing to train models |
Pricing Comparison
Lido starts at $30/mo, while Nanonets starts at $499/mo.